![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzxGxPrPDaPmIlvdivAivxv4YpOCnJ-0aFr8NuJ99Xiyiyhtj3aLITBDhyphenhyphene7IRMM3DKbdQ742oDXNmr7n55HFABfjlmuUJzq6QYvw6pMTzA53bOp1OM3O3v9oMbXQx5EG8e21WVt1Ic4OJ/s400/250px-IPad-02.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPJ5ak4f8fTrY05ve9rBtMQLkUclhk4KlBOxBadz1y6xiq0LxZKCZ1WGk68cZxnERAC-WxSO6i77T7Pzmb9fdrFYUiwBCEWnvZWFQkKay1euJmhWEw4qay9o5HXhF2woMg1RpLU_WFMxVC/s400/150px-TI_SpeakSpell_no_shadow.jpg)
I am in the midst of revising an article that chronicles the intellectual history of "reform" in educational settings. Consequently, all sorts of half-baked suppositions swirl regularly in my head. However, I think I'm on to something here. Seeing as how "reform" and "innovation" are potentially different sides of the same coin I am going to make a seemingly bold claim.
The intellectual prototype for the iPhone (and iPad) was the Speak & Spell.
Now, you probably are re-reading the previous line that includes the phrase "half-baked", but hear me out.
I don't mean to say that the technologies of Texas Instruments' Speak & Spell and Apple's iPhone/iPad are in any way related or intertwined. But, I do mean to claim that the the social and intellectual conceptualization that enables us to view, understand, and revere the iPhone/iPad---the intellectual history if you will---germanated within the historical era of the Speak & Spell. Because of the paradigmatic technogical shift and shift in thinking about learning and communication as play that occurred with the Speak & Spell we are able to see the iPhone/iPad as the appropriately magical and desirable product that it is. We were sent down an epistemological trajectory that primed us for iPhone/iPad affinity.
Gotta go tend to my mac and cheese.