<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395378940643679791.post9020665233075686232..comments</id><updated>2009-05-17T16:34:20.906-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Archive Fever: Time Magazine's 10 Biggest Tech Failures of the La...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.archivefever.com/feeds/9020665233075686232/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2395378940643679791/9020665233075686232/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.archivefever.com/2009/05/time-magazines-10-biggest-tech-failures.html'/><author><name>hilltaylor@unc.edu</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02207063102557561431</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395378940643679791.post-7471855742438606848</id><published>2009-05-17T16:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-17T16:34:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Interesting list. 

Saw the same article the day i...</title><content type='html'>Interesting list. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saw the same article the day it came out and was wondering who got to be the judge of "failure". Funny that I've used 5 of the products on this list within the last 7 days (no, the Segway was not one of them).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;High-profile items that are fun to bash/trash and not very profitable in many respects but "failure" may be too strong of a term. What about the MILLIONS of failed ideas that are being distilled everyday into the next ipod?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I agree with your assessment that they they are liken to bricks (albeit weaker ones) of the tech society. Without innovation (both successful and "failures") it's real hard to move forward...(ie: Lyman Gilmore and Comp-u-serve)...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;gotta go, call coming in on the Iridium...</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2395378940643679791/9020665233075686232/comments/default/7471855742438606848'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2395378940643679791/9020665233075686232/comments/default/7471855742438606848'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.archivefever.com/2009/05/time-magazines-10-biggest-tech-failures.html?showComment=1242592440000#c7471855742438606848' title=''/><author><name>Matt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06562654593899457564</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.archivefever.com/2009/05/time-magazines-10-biggest-tech-failures.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395378940643679791.post-9020665233075686232' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2395378940643679791/posts/default/9020665233075686232' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>